Banned Books Week

Posted on 7 October 2009 at 5:36 pm in Musings.

Born in 1982, the American Library Association’s “Banned Books Week” is an annual opportunity for libraries to focus on freedom of information, anti-censorship policies, and defense of a patron’s freedom to read. Rather than sitting back and defending library materials when under attack, the Banned Books Week event becomes an offensive tool, deployed by the ALA and by librarians across the country to emphasize the importance of literary freedom.

It’s a tactic that has drawn fire — the Wall Street Journal recently published a critical piece on the concept. In it, writer Mitchell Muncy criticizes the ALA for including legal challenges to books whether or not they successfully lead to the removal of a book in their banned book statistics. He states that 90% of book challenges do not lead to the permanent removal of the book in question, and therefore the low rate of successful challenges is evidence that an event like Banned Books Week is unnecessary and “overblown”.

In refutation: the fact that 90% of challenges fail is a credit to Banned Books Week and the substantial advocacy the librarian profession engages in. It is evidence that the event and the activism it represents is successful and should continue. I would also contest his assertion that censorship only exists when directed by the state:

“To examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable.” – Merriam-Webster Dictionary

The very definition of the word fails to mention government. It’s my understanding that censorship can come in many forms, not only from the state, but from community groups, teachers, individual parents, or neighborhood gadflys. Anytime pressure is applied to remove information (be it a book, film, or even the forced retraction of a public statement) in such a way that it would deny access to others, it veers into the dangerous territory of censorship.

Muncy’s too casual assumption that it’s only censorship if it’s driven by the state, and that the success of the ALA in defending controversial materials is somehow an argument against its continued activism are faulty premises.

Long live Banned Books Week. If nothing else, it’s a great chance to celebrate the controversial, confrontational, and vital books that change our world one reader at a time.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

2 Comments

  1. Comment by jsr on October 8, 2009 at 12:13 am.

    wish I had more than two thumbs to put up! nice post!

  2. Comment by Adina Leitner on October 12, 2009 at 5:11 pm.

    In an Intellectual Freedom class taught by Professor C. James Schmidt, I created a database reviewing every book which had been suggested for banning in California (in fact the town of Banning, CA banned books). The majority of books which have been banned (or books people have tried to ban) are children’s books. One of the tenants of the Library Bill of Rights is that libraries and librarians are not to act in loco parentis. Almost all of the books which I surveyed deal with sexual education, alternative lifestyles, and occult (á la Harry Potter). When a child or teenager finds that their family is unlike others in their neighborhood, or that they themselves are different from their friends, they should have the right to turn to a free, safe place to learn and to explore. While doing my research I came across a multitude of parent groups bent on censoring what other people’s children read.

    Banned books are simply one person trying to censor another’s point of view. I believe that one week a year is worth celebrating that fact that we have not fallen to censorship. That so many books which are challenged or banned are acclaimed by reputable sources and have become literary jewels is a testament to the openness of the minds of readers. I really enjoyed your post Daniel – keep up the good work!

Sorry, the comment form is now closed.

Top